Reign of Error by Diane Ravitch

Dear readers,

Definitely go out and buy Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to Americas Public Schools by Diane Ravitch, which just has been launched with proper publicity. She is an amazing person-sending out a half-  dozen of emails a day, three books in the last decade, and traveling to speak throughout the  USA. Maybe changing your mind gives you energy, because my exhaustion comes (in part) from feeling it has been said before (including by me).

Reign of Error lays out step by step the relentless thirty year drive to either centralize the education of the young-on one hand-or divest it entirely into privatized hands on the other. Finally, the two sides have joined forces on a strategy that simultaneously does both. While this coalition has many old roots, in its current form it began with the fanfare around the publication of A Nation at Risk (1983). Ravitch was, at that time, a supporter of this bold statement that more or less accused America's teachers and school boards of a plot to undermine American health and welfare on the international scene. We were, said the signers, at risk of becoming a second rate nation if we did not take this crisis seriously. When asked AFT leader leader Al Shanker said he signed it because, "It's true our schools are not as bad as the report suggests, but we are entering a new period and they either have to change dramatically or what the report accuses them of will become true. We need a smarter citizenry."

The trouble is that crying "wolf" has never been a great way to make sensible policy. Sometimes there's no choice (like Pearl Harbor). But the continuous claims that our public education system is destroying our nation has almost entirely led to bad policy.

And  in the past few years Diane's change of mind has been a particular blessing. She hasn't, as her preset opponents claim, done a complete switch at all-she was always pro-union, pro-public education and always for standards. Fairly traditional standards. She criticized progressive educators for abandoning standards, though this wasn't the case.

Then lo and behold: no one has pulled it all together better than Diane-over and over again in the past few years she has led the challenge to the corporate reformers-right, center and left. Her last two books Reign of Error and The Death and Life of the Great American School System (20100 pull it altogether.

In Reign of Error she spends the first 20 chapters laying out the case, and the last 13 offering some obvious and do-able responses to the oft-heard, "but what else can we do?" She's more supportive of the "way things were" than many other educators (like me) have been, relying subliminally perhaps on the fact that if we eliminate the scores of children in poverty on international tests, the USA does quite well. Yes, Massachusetts scores put it number one in the world, or close, if it were a nation (like Singapore?) rather than a mere state of the union. But I think neither of us is truly satisfied with what has passed for a good education in its highly regarded school districts, much less the districts that served the least advantaged schools. She also over estimates the degree to which Americans ever attended "common schools". That's another story which all this crisis talk leaves untouched-or as she ably documents, and where the promising fledgling progressive reforms of the 60s through 80s has focused on. Ted Sizer, author of a study of American high schools said, "using one's mind well" is the essential unexplored task facing the high schools for democracy. We have barely skimmed the surface of making either our schools or our democracy "belong" to everyone.\

Thank you, Diane. We all need to keep this book handy so we can whip out the citations to make our case for the kind of reform American really needs, in your own words: "to prepare citizens with the minds, hearts, and character to sustain our democracy into the future."

Best,

Debra